Today, I paid $2.27 a gallon for gasoline. That’s my all-time high. And I have begun re-thinking how I use my automobile. Should I carpool? Should I work at home? Should I stop running to the grocery store three times a week? Should I find entertainment closer to home?
A colleague of mine in England was complaining that to fill up his car, the cost in US dollars was nearly $100 (over $5 per gallon). And then I thought how glad I was to not live in England. But it nevertheless is frightening to me to think that gas might be at $2.50 soon, and the worldwide price of raw crude will be over $100 a gallon, three times what is was just a year ago. Unwanted lifestyle changes will be in order.
And what has the Bush administration done to help reduce the cost of gasoline, or to reduce our dependence on oil? Apparently, the answer is “not a damn thing”. The Bush administration’s energy policy is, to quote
Steve Soto, “drill today, drill tomorrow, drill forever”. This enriches the energy companies and gives OPEC a huge lever into the American economy, neither of which are particularly desirable goals, if you ask me. But Soto also points out that the Bush administration has basically ignored other sources of energy and conservation, leaving America at risk. Not only that, Bush has forced congress to
not put into place corporate average fuel economy standards, and has given tax breaks to companies that buy Hummers.
This lack of action on energy has scared many people, not just myself. Fortunately, a
bi-partisan group of military and political bigwigs have begun making noise, saying that America is at risk unless we begin developing alternative energy sources and reduce our dependence on the consumption of oil. While they are bringing this up at this time, even if the United States government began acting immediately on their recommendations, no results will be seen for years. If we delay acting until Bush is out of office, the harm is even greater.
Prepare yourself for $5.00 a gallon gasoline.