In the World Series, we were treated to a
ridiculous camera angle from in the dirt in front of home plate — wonderful, if you really wanted to view the batter’s nostrils, but useless if you wanted to enjoy and understand the baseball game — things like whether or not the pitch was high or low, or inside or outside were obscured from this angle, but the batter’s nostrils were plainly visible.
In football, we are now treated to the “behind-the-quarterback” shots, another useless camera angle that does nothing to help the viewer appreciate the game. I have seen, from this useless camera angle, a quarterback drop back and throw a long pass, caught for a touchdown, by a player who was one-eighth of an inch tall going away from the camera. Did I appreciate the play more from this camera angle? No, of course not, because the ability of the receiver to keep his feet inbounds as he made the catch was lost in this camera angle. You could barely see the receiver, much less where his feet were.
Viewing a play from “behind the quarterback” also prevents the viewer from accurately gauging the number of yards gained. You no longer can see the runner passing yard markers, you can only see the number on his back getting slightly smaller. Yet the number of yards gained is the most crucial piece of information football fans want to know on each play. All else is secondary. But we now have a camera angle that emphasizes the secondary information, while ignoring the primary information.
Today, we are treated to a
glowing article from
The New York Times, extolling the technological virtues of such a system. Sadly, there is not a dissenting word in the article, only meaningless compliments from someone who obviously doesn’t understand that the tried-and-true camera angles are best because they have been proven, over the decades, to be the best camera angles. "What you see visually in sports coverage is a constant attempt to get more intimate, to bring the viewer closer to the action," said Ed Goren, president and executive producer of Fox Sports. You know, Ed, I don’t want intimacy when I watch football, I want to have the best possible view of what is happening, and those tried-and-true sideline angle shots usually bring that to me. I don’t care if it is technologically advanced, give me information instead of glitz.