Here at Paige’s Page World Headquarters, we have become aware that there is a race underway for the elected position of President of the United States. Usually, we tend to ignore these things because we despise the five-second sound-bites that traditional broadcast journalism supplies; and
we despise the unpleasant and insulting political ads associated with it.
One of the good things about the Internet is that it enables you to read a candidate’s position, in his own words (or those of his staffers), in quite a bit of detail. And so you can read President Bush’s positions at
his web site, and similarly at
the web site of Senator Kerry. We shall be reading both of these positions, along with detailed arguments put forth by interested special interest groups, in the next few months in preparation for the election. We shall, from time to time, report the candidates’ positions and on-the-job performance from the past several years, compare, contrast, investigate the facts, and opine. There will be no name calling here, no insulting comments, but we shall certainly state that we agree or disagree, that we approve or disapprove.
Some of the issues that are of the
most concern to us here at Paige’s Page recently are jobs (we have written about corporate downsizing in several places, most recently
here) and associated with that is health care (lose your job, lose your health care). National security, being safe from terrorism, would be the next biggest issue we are concerned with.
We will not try to be unbiased, since we are not unbiased. There’s no requirement for a voter to be unbiased anyway, and furthermore we feel that everyone is biased in one way or another — I doubt there is a single person who will look at this Presidential campaign without pre-existing opinions on some issues. Bias isn’t necessarily bad — unless it prevents a voter from considering both sides of an issue.
Finally, let me point out that I don’t really care what a candidate did 20 or 30 years ago. I do care what he has done in the last several years, and what he plans to do in the future. Nor is character a huge issue for me, unless the lack of character becomes extreme. I believe that both candidates have sufficient character that its not an issue for me, and furthermore, there are no perfect individuals anyway, including me. If evidence turns up that a candidate beats his wife, or likes Barney the dinosaur, I would reconsider. But so far, I don’t particularly see either candidate having character issues. And so at the present time, I will not be discussing character issues, my plans for commentary are limited to a candidates recent performance on the job, and his stated positions.